I'm willing to bet you are member of a no cost content
distribution network. I participate in several. They have names like
Facebook, Goggle+, YouTube, Pinterest and Twitter. They make (or try
to make) their money selling ad views to their content providers, aka,
you. We like their services (generally) and we like their pricing (free.)
They like our free content and our page views.
I've been
using Twitter to initiate updates across my accounts because they seemed to be capable
of playing well with others. Up until Friday that is when they and Linked In
broke up.
The big boys don't
want to play well together. They keep trying to herd us into exclusivity
contracts with them so they can "manage" (control) our page views. Personally I
don't like being herded. It's becoming like the early home computer wars, everyone wants you locked in with them
At some point
someone is going to enter the field and offer a central content
distribution system that integrates with everything and everyone. You
can think of them as an ubiquitous, all pervasive content outlet,
kind of a Visa or MasterCard for content. The other branded credit cards
(content networks) will still be out there but we'll all rely on our Visa
and MasterCard.
This Twitter –
Linked In spat is not anything I won't get over. It's not my first
breakup and probably not my last, but it is annoying. Now I have to
re-evaluate my personal content distribution work flow.
Don't forget you and your content are the value of these networks.
George W. Parker
George W. Parker
No comments:
Post a Comment